Datalogic 944900004 vs Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1B1G: Specification Comparison
Both the Datalogic Memor 35 (944900004) and the Honeywell CK67 (CK67-X1N-58A1B1G) are 5G-capable Android handheld mobile computers with IP65/IP68 ratings, MIL-spec drop protection, and 1D/2D barcode scanning — placing them squarely in the same enterprise rugged handheld class. This comparison evaluates how they differ across scanning range and display design, processing power and connectivity, and physical form factor and battery endurance, giving integrators and IT buyers the data needed to match each device to the right deployment scenario.
In This Guide
Which device wins on scanning range and display usability?
The Honeywell CK67 ships with a dedicated FlexRange XLR Imager rated to capture 1D and 2D barcodes at distances from near-contact up to 20+ meters. The Datalogic Memor 35 spec lists a 1D/2D Area Imager supporting the same symbology families (Code 128, Code 39, UPC/EAN, QR Code, Data Matrix, PDF417), but no maximum read distance is published in the provided specifications. Buyers requiring verified long-range scanning — warehouse pick aisles, racking, yard management — have a documented number only on the CK67 side.
On display, the two devices diverge sharply. The Memor 35 carries a 6.0-inch Full HD+ panel at 2160×1080 resolution protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 5, making it well-suited for data-entry-heavy or map/image-driven workflows. The CK67 uses a 4.3-inch display at 800×480 with Gorilla Glass 7 — a newer glass generation but lower resolution and considerably smaller area. For operators who need to view detailed content, forms, or photography, the Memor 35's larger, sharper screen is the clear advantage; for scan-centric tasks where screen real estate matters less, the CK67's compact display paired with its physical keypad form factor is purpose-built.
How do the two units compare on processing, cellular, and wireless connectivity?
Both devices use Qualcomm octa-core silicon, but different variants. The Memor 35 is equipped with the Qualcomm QCM4490 running at 2.4 GHz, while the CK67 uses the Qualcomm QCS4490 at 2.0 GHz. The Memor 35 also offers a RAM configuration choice of 6 GB or 8 GB; the CK67 ships with 6 GB RAM only. Both devices provide 128 GB internal storage with microSD expansion.
On cellular, the CK67 explicitly supports 5G Sub-6 GHz and mmWave bands, with a Nano SIM plus eSIM dual-SIM arrangement. The Memor 35 is specified as a 5G device, but the provided specifications do not detail Sub-6 GHz vs. mmWave band coverage or SIM configuration. Wi-Fi is functionally equivalent: both support 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (Wi-Fi 6E) and Bluetooth 5.2. Both include NFC. The Memor 35 specifies USB 3.2 Type-C; the CK67 lists USB without a version designation in the provided specs.
Which device is better suited to harsh environments and extended shift use?
Both units share IP65/IP68 ingress protection. Drop protection differs in how it is expressed: the Memor 35 cites MIL-STD-810H compliance without a specific drop height in the provided specifications; the CK67 states a concrete 2.4 m (8 ft) drop rating without citing MIL-STD-810H. Neither spec set documents tumble testing. Integrators needing a certified standard citation have it on the Memor 35; those needing a specific drop-height number have it on the CK67.
Battery capacity favors the CK67 substantially: 7,000 mAh Li-Ion versus 4,680 mAh on the Memor 35. The CK67 spec also notes multi-shift operation capability. The Memor 35 counters with safe-swap (hot-swap) battery capability and wireless charging — neither of which is listed in the CK67 spec. For operations where battery swapping between shifts is logistically practical, the Memor 35's hot-swap feature can extend runtime without downtime; for environments where swapping is impractical, the CK67's larger fixed cell is the stronger option. The CK67 is also heavier at 516 g versus 327 g for the Memor 35, a relevant ergonomic factor for all-day carry. The CK67 provides a published operating temperature range of -20°C to 50°C and storage temperature of -30°C to 70°C; the Memor 35 spec does not list operating or storage temperature limits in the provided data.
Which should you choose: the 944900004 or the CK67-X1N-58A1B1G?
Our take: The 944900004 Memor 35 is the stronger choice when deployments demand a large high-resolution touchscreen, lighter carry weight, and hot-swap or wireless charging flexibility. Key spec deltas: the Memor 35 outweighs the CK67 display by a significant margin (6.0 in / 2160×1080 vs. 4.3 in / 800×480), is 189 g lighter (327 g vs. 516 g), and adds safe-swap battery and wireless charging not listed for the CK67. Conversely, the CK67-X1N-58A1B1G is the stronger choice for scan-centric warehouse or yard operations: it delivers a documented 20+ meter FlexRange XLR scan range (no equivalent distance figure exists in the Memor 35 spec), a larger 7,000 mAh fixed battery rated for multi-shift use, explicit mmWave 5G coverage, and dual Nano SIM + eSIM — none of which are confirmed in the Memor 35 spec. Platform matters: the CK67 runs on Honeywell's ScanPal ecosystem; the Memor 35 runs standard Android 13 with GMS and an upgrade path to Android 18.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Datalogic 944900004 | Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1B1G |
|---|---|---|
| Product Family | Memor 35 | CK67 |
| SKU | 944900004 | CK67-X1N-58A1B1G |
| Processor | Qualcomm QCM4490 Octa-Core 2.4 GHz | Qualcomm QCS4490 Octa-Core 2.0 GHz |
| RAM | 6 GB or 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB UFS + microSD (up to 2 TB) | 128 GB Flash + microSD |
| Operating System | Android 13 (upgradable to Android 18) with GMS | Android with GMS |
| Display | 6.0 in, 2160×1080 Full HD+, Gorilla Glass 5 | 4.3 in, 800×480, Gorilla Glass 7 |
| Scan Engine | 1D/2D Area Imager | FlexRange XLR Imager (1D/2D, up to 20+ m) |
| IP Rating | IP65/IP68 | IP65/IP68 |
| Drop Rating | MIL-STD-810H (drop height not specified) | 2.4 m (8 ft) |
| Battery | 4,680 mAh, safe-swap, wireless charging | 7,000 mAh Li-Ion (no swap/wireless charging listed) |
| 5G | 5G (band coverage not specified in provided spec) | 5G Sub-6 GHz and mmWave |
| SIM | — (not specified in provided spec) | Nano SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi | 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (Wi-Fi 6/6E) | 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (Wi-Fi 6E) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (integrated reader) |
| Camera | 13 MP rear; 8 MP front | 13 MP rear (front not specified in provided spec) |
| USB | USB 3.2 Type-C | USB (version not specified in provided spec) |
| Weight | 327 g (0.72 lbs) | 516 g (1.14 lbs) |
| Dimensions (mm) | 78.5 × 168 × 17.8 | 220 × 83 × 37 |
| Operating Temperature | — (not specified in provided spec) | -20°C to 50°C |
| Storage Temperature | — (not specified in provided spec) | -30°C to 70°C |
| Platform / Ecosystem | Standard Android / GMS | Honeywell ScanPal |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the 944900004 or the CK67-X1N-58A1B1G?
The 944900004 Memor 35 is the stronger choice when deployments demand a large high-resolution touchscreen, lighter carry weight, and hot-swap or wireless charging flexibility. Key spec deltas: the Memor 35 outweighs the CK67 display by a significant margin (6.0 in / 2160×1080 vs. 4.3 in / 800×480), is 189 g lighter (327 g vs. 516 g), and adds safe-swap battery and wireless charging not listed for the CK67. Conversely, the CK67-X1N-58A1B1G is the stronger choice for scan-centric warehouse or yard operations: it delivers a documented 20+ meter FlexRange XLR scan range (no equivalent distance figure exists in the Memor 35 spec), a larger 7,000 mAh fixed battery rated for multi-shift use, explicit mmWave 5G coverage, and dual Nano SIM + eSIM — none of which are confirmed in the Memor 35 spec. Platform matters: the CK67 runs on Honeywell's ScanPal ecosystem; the Memor 35 runs standard Android 13 with GMS and an upgrade path to Android 18.
Is the Datalogic Memor 35 or the Honeywell CK67 better for warehouse scanning at long distances?
Based on the provided specifications, only the Honeywell CK67 carries a documented maximum scan range: its FlexRange XLR Imager is rated for 1D/2D capture up to 20+ meters. The Datalogic Memor 35 spec confirms a 1D/2D Area Imager but does not publish a maximum read distance. If long-range scanning is a primary requirement, the CK67 is the only device of the two with a verified distance figure to cite.
Which device is easier for workers to carry all day — the Memor 35 or the CK67?
The Datalogic Memor 35 weighs 327 g (0.72 lbs), while the Honeywell CK67 weighs 516 g (18.2 oz / 1.14 lbs) — a difference of approximately 189 g. Additionally, the Memor 35 is physically smaller (78.5 × 168 × 17.8 mm vs. 220 × 83 × 37 mm). For all-day handheld carry, the Memor 35 is meaningfully lighter and more compact based on the stated specs.
Can either device operate through a full shift without a battery swap or recharge?
The Honeywell CK67 has a 7,000 mAh Li-Ion battery and is described in its spec as suited for multi-shift operation, making it the higher-capacity fixed cell. The Datalogic Memor 35 has a 4,680 mAh battery but supports safe-swap (hot-swap) replacement and wireless charging — features not listed for the CK67. If swapping charged batteries mid-shift is operationally feasible, the Memor 35 can sustain continuous runtime through that method; if uninterrupted use without swaps is required, the CK67's larger battery is the documented advantage.
More Mobile Computer Comparisons
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Honeywell CK67-X0N-5EC1C2G
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1B1G
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1A1G
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1C1G
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Datalogic 944950001
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Datalogic 944900004
Mobile Computer Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.