CipherLab A82B0RSN42VU1 vs CipherLab ARK25CCCNU101: Specification Comparison
Both the CipherLab A82B0RSN42VU1 and the CipherLab ARK25CCCNU101 are handheld mobile computers with 2D barcode scan engines, positioned for warehouse, logistics, and field data-collection workflows. The A82B0RSN42VU1 belongs to CipherLab's 8200 series and runs the proprietary CipherLab cOS, while the ARK25CCCNU101 is an Android-platform rugged handheld running Android 7.0 through 11.0 with GMS. This comparison evaluates scan capability and symbology support, ruggedness and operating environment, and computing platform and memory against each other for B2B buyers selecting a mobile data-collection device.
In This Guide
- How do scan capability, symbology support, and display compare between the A82B0RSN42VU1 and ARK25CCCNU101?
- Which unit is rated for harsher environments — how do IP rating, drop spec, and MIL-STD certification compare?
- How do the computing platform, memory, storage, and battery life compare between the two units?
- Which should you choose: the A82B0RSN42VU1 or the ARK25CCCNU101?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
How do scan capability, symbology support, and display compare between the A82B0RSN42VU1 and ARK25CCCNU101?
Both units ship with a 2D imager and share a common 1D symbology base: Code 128, Code 39, UPC, and EAN. Both read QR Code and Data Matrix in the 2D tier. The ARK25CCCNU101 adds PDF417 as a specified 2D symbology; the A82B0RSN42VU1 spec does not list PDF417.
Display size and resolution differ significantly. The A82B0RSN42VU1 uses a 2.1-inch monochrome panel at 160x160 pixels. The ARK25CCCNU101 uses a 4-inch WVGA TN LCD at 480x800 pixels with Corning Gorilla Glass. The ARK25CCCNU101 display is larger, higher-resolution, and glass-protected; the A82B0RSN42VU1 display spec does not indicate touch capability or glass protection.
The ARK25CCCNU101 specifies Wi-Fi 802.11 connectivity. The A82B0RSN42VU1 spec does not list any wireless connectivity. Buyers requiring network-connected scanning will need to verify connectivity options for the A82B0RSN42VU1 independently, as none are documented in the provided specifications.
Which unit is rated for harsher environments — how do IP rating, drop spec, and MIL-STD certification compare?
The A82B0RSN42VU1 carries an IP54 rating, protecting against limited dust ingress and water spray. The ARK25CCCNU101 is rated IP65, which is fully dust-tight and protects against low-pressure water jets from any direction. For environments with significant dust, outdoor spray, or wash-down exposure, the ARK25CCCNU101's IP65 rating provides a meaningfully higher level of protection.
Drop specification also favors the ARK25CCCNU101. The A82B0RSN42VU1 is rated for 1.2 m drops on concrete, tested 5 times per face. The ARK25CCCNU101 is rated for 1.5 m drops, and 1.8 m when a protective boot is fitted. Additionally, the ARK25CCCNU101 carries MIL-STD-810G certification; the A82B0RSN42VU1 spec does not list any MIL-STD certification.
Weight reflects the difference in build: the A82B0RSN42VU1 is 150 g, while the ARK25CCCNU101 is 292 g with battery and 2D imager. The lighter weight of the A82B0RSN42VU1 may reduce fatigue in light-duty, high-frequency scan tasks, but the ARK25CCCNU101's additional mass corresponds to its larger battery, display, and more robust enclosure.
How do the computing platform, memory, storage, and battery life compare between the two units?
The A82B0RSN42VU1 runs CipherLab's proprietary cOS on a 32-bit CPU with 8 MB Flash and 4 MB or 8 MB SRAM. Application support is limited to what CipherLab's cOS ecosystem provides; no third-party Android app ecosystem is available. Storage expansion is via a microSD slot with SDHC support, with no specified maximum capacity in the provided specs.
The ARK25CCCNU101 runs Android 7.0, 9.0, or 11.0 with GMS on a Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex A53 processor, with either 2 GB RAM / 16 GB Flash or 3 GB RAM / 32 GB Flash depending on configuration. MicroSD expansion supports up to 32 GB additional storage. Android with GMS enables access to the Google Play ecosystem and standard enterprise mobility management (EMM) platforms.
Battery capacity is 1200 mAh on the A82B0RSN42VU1 versus 4000 mAh on the ARK25CCCNU101. Runtime figures are not provided in the supplied specifications for either unit, so direct shift-length comparison cannot be made from available data. Both carry a 2-Year Warranty per the provided specifications.
Which should you choose: the A82B0RSN42VU1 or the ARK25CCCNU101?
Our take: The ARK25CCCNU101 is the stronger choice when deployments demand Android application compatibility, higher environmental resilience, or extended battery capacity. Its IP65 rating surpasses the A82B0RSN42VU1's IP54 by a full tier, its drop spec reaches 1.5 m bare and 1.8 m booted versus 1.2 m, and its 4000 mAh battery is 3.3× larger than the A82B0RSN42VU1's 1200 mAh cell. The Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex A53 with up to 3 GB RAM and 32 GB Flash on Android with GMS opens a broad EMM and app ecosystem unavailable on CipherLab cOS. The A82B0RSN42VU1 is appropriate where existing CipherLab cOS infrastructure is in place, where device weight is a primary concern at 150 g versus 292 g, or where a simpler, purpose-built scan terminal fits the workflow. Buyers requiring PDF417 support, Wi-Fi connectivity, or MIL-STD-810G certification should select the ARK25CCCNU101 based on the provided specifications.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | CipherLab A82B0RSN42VU1 | CipherLab ARK25CCCNU101 |
|---|---|---|
| Product Series | 8200 Mobile Computer | RK25 Android Mobile Computer |
| Form Factor | Handheld | Handheld |
| Operating System | CipherLab cOS | Android 7.0 / 9.0 / 11.0 with GMS |
| CPU | 32-bit | Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex A53 |
| RAM | 4 MB or 8 MB SRAM | 2 GB or 3 GB |
| Internal Storage (Flash) | 8 MB Flash | 16 GB or 32 GB |
| Storage Expansion | microSD (SDHC) | microSD (SDHC, up to 32 GB) |
| Display | 2.1" mono, 160x160 px | 4" TN LCD, 480x800 px, Gorilla Glass |
| Scan Engine | 2D | 2D |
| Symbologies (2D) | QR Code, Data Matrix | QR Code, Data Matrix, PDF417 |
| Symbologies (1D) | Code 128, Code 39, UPC, EAN | Code 128, Code 39, UPC, EAN |
| IP Rating | IP54 | IP65 |
| Drop Specification | 1.2 m, 5x per face | 1.5 m bare / 1.8 m with boot |
| MIL-STD Certification | — | MIL-STD-810G |
| Battery Capacity | 1200 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Weight | 150 g (5.3 oz) | 292 g (with battery and 2D imager) |
| Wireless Connectivity | — | Wi-Fi 802.11 |
| Dimensions | 136 x 58 x 25–32 mm | 168 x 73.8 x 26 mm |
| Warranty | 2-Year | 2-Year |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the A82B0RSN42VU1 or the ARK25CCCNU101?
The ARK25CCCNU101 is the stronger choice when deployments demand Android application compatibility, higher environmental resilience, or extended battery capacity. Its IP65 rating surpasses the A82B0RSN42VU1's IP54 by a full tier, its drop spec reaches 1.5 m bare and 1.8 m booted versus 1.2 m, and its 4000 mAh battery is 3.3× larger than the A82B0RSN42VU1's 1200 mAh cell. The Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex A53 with up to 3 GB RAM and 32 GB Flash on Android with GMS opens a broad EMM and app ecosystem unavailable on CipherLab cOS. The A82B0RSN42VU1 is appropriate where existing CipherLab cOS infrastructure is in place, where device weight is a primary concern at 150 g versus 292 g, or where a simpler, purpose-built scan terminal fits the workflow. Buyers requiring PDF417 support, Wi-Fi connectivity, or MIL-STD-810G certification should select the ARK25CCCNU101 based on the provided specifications.
Is the A82B0RSN42VU1 or ARK25CCCNU101 better for a warehouse with frequent wash-downs or heavy dust?
The ARK25CCCNU101 is better suited for those conditions. It carries an IP65 rating, meaning it is fully dust-tight and resistant to low-pressure water jets from any direction. The A82B0RSN42VU1 is rated IP54, which limits dust ingress but does not provide full dust exclusion, and water protection is limited to spray rather than directed jets.
Can I run my existing Android warehouse apps on both devices?
No. The ARK25CCCNU101 runs Android 7.0, 9.0, or 11.0 with GMS, making it compatible with Android apps and standard EMM platforms. The A82B0RSN42VU1 runs CipherLab's proprietary cOS on a 32-bit platform; Android applications are not supported. App compatibility with cOS should be verified directly with CipherLab for that unit.
Which device scans PDF417 barcodes such as those on driver's licenses or shipping labels?
The ARK25CCCNU101 lists PDF417 as a supported 2D symbology in the provided specifications. The A82B0RSN42VU1 specification does not list PDF417 among its supported symbologies. Buyers whose workflow includes PDF417 scanning should select the ARK25CCCNU101 or confirm PDF417 support with CipherLab before purchasing the A82B0RSN42VU1.
More Mobile Computer Comparisons
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Honeywell CK67-X0N-5EC1C2G
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1B1G
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1A1G
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1C1G
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Datalogic 944950001
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Datalogic 944900004
Mobile Computer Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.