TP-Link SG2428P vs Hanwha X530DP-28GHXM-900: Specification Comparison
Both the TP-Link SG2428P and the Hanwha HV-X530DP-28GHXM-900 are 28-port managed PoE switches aimed at IP security deployments — cameras, access controllers, and intercoms that draw power over Ethernet. The SG2428P targets SMB and mid-market installs under Omada SDN management with a 250W PoE+ budget and gigabit fabric, while the HV-X530DP-28GHXM-900 is a high-density PoE++ platform with a 1480W budget, dual redundant PSUs, and a 160 Gbps switching fabric intended for large, mission-critical camera deployments.
In This Guide
- How much PoE power and per-port headroom does each switch actually deliver?
- What is the port configuration and switching throughput of each switch?
- How do the two switches compare on power resilience, management, and installation platform?
- Which should you choose: the SG2428P or the X530DP-28GHXM-900?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
How much PoE power and per-port headroom does each switch actually deliver?
The SG2428P provides a 250W aggregate PoE+ (802.3af/at) budget shared across 24 ports, which averages roughly 10W per port at full load — adequate for standard IP cameras (typically 7–15W) but insufficient for dual-band PTZ cameras or multi-sensor units that can exceed 30W. The PoE standard tops out at 30W per port under 802.3at.
The HV-X530DP-28GHXM-900 delivers 1480W aggregate PoE++ (802.3bt, Class 6) with up to 60W per port across its PoE-capable ports. This is nearly 6× the total budget of the SG2428P and supports high-draw devices such as multi-sensor panoramic cameras, PTZ units with heaters, and PoE-powered edge compute appliances without budget throttling. The 802.3bt standard enables per-port delivery that the SG2428P's 802.3at standard cannot match.
What is the port configuration and switching throughput of each switch?
The SG2428P provides 24 × 1GbE PoE+ access ports plus 4 × 1G SFP uplink slots. All links are gigabit; there are no multi-gig or 10G uplink options specified. Switching capacity and forwarding rate are not provided in the available specifications.
The HV-X530DP-28GHXM-900 offers 20 × 1GbE access ports, 4 × variable-speed ports, and 4 × 10G SFP+ uplink slots, with a specified switching fabric of 160 Gbps and 119 Mpps forwarding throughput. The 10G SFP+ uplinks allow high-bandwidth aggregation to a core switch or NVR, a capability absent from the SG2428P's spec sheet. The variable-speed port group is not further defined in the provided specifications.
How do the two switches compare on power resilience, management, and installation platform?
The SG2428P is a single-PSU switch managed via TP-Link's Omada SDN platform, supporting 802.1Q VLAN, STP/RSTP/MSTP, IGMP Snooping, 802.1p/DSCP QoS, ACL, LACP, Static Routing, and 802.1x/RADIUS/TACACS+ port authentication. Omada SDN enables cloud or on-premises controller-based management with zero-touch provisioning across TP-Link Omada devices. No redundant PSU is specified.
The HV-X530DP-28GHXM-900 features dual hot-swap PSU bays with N+1 failover, meaning one PSU can fail or be replaced under load without interrupting PoE delivery — a critical differentiator for always-on surveillance infrastructure. Its management is described as a managed Ethernet switch using PF link-local signaling; granular feature support (VLAN, QoS, ACL, routing protocols) is not enumerated in the provided specifications. The Ethernet Rate field lists 'Protection Switched Ring,' suggesting ring-topology redundancy support, but no further detail is available in the provided specs. Mount type is rack for both units; the HV unit weighs 16.49 lb and ships from Indonesia with a 5-year warranty. Warranty and country of origin are not specified for the SG2428P.
Which should you choose: the SG2428P or the X530DP-28GHXM-900?
Our take: The HV-X530DP-28GHXM-900 is the stronger choice when deploying large-scale, high-draw camera systems that require uninterrupted PoE power and high-capacity uplinks. Its 1480W PoE++ budget is 5.9× greater than the SG2428P's 250W, its 60W-per-port ceiling supports 802.3bt Class 6 devices the SG2428P cannot power, and its dual hot-swap N+1 PSU bays eliminate single-point power failure — a capability the SG2428P lacks entirely. The 4 × 10G SFP+ uplinks and 160 Gbps / 119 Mpps fabric provide headroom the SG2428P's all-gigabit architecture cannot match. The SG2428P is appropriate for smaller installs — 24 standard IP cameras on a 250W budget — where Omada SDN's well-documented VLAN, QoS, ACL, and RADIUS/TACACS+ feature set offers richer documented management control than the HV unit's spec sheet provides. Installers standardized on Omada SDN or constrained by budget should consider the SG2428P; those running Hanwha Wisenet VMS platforms or high-density PoE++ camera deployments should select the HV-X530DP-28GHXM-900.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | TP-Link SG2428P | Hanwha X530DP-28GHXM-900 |
|---|---|---|
| Total PoE Budget | 250W | 1480W |
| PoE Standard | 802.3at (PoE+) | 802.3bt (PoE++, Class 6) |
| Max Per-Port PoE | 30W (802.3at) | 60W (802.3bt Class 6) |
| PoE-Capable Access Ports | 24 × 1GbE | 20 × 1GbE + 4 × variable-speed |
| Uplink Ports | 4 × 1G SFP | 4 × 10G SFP+ |
| Total Ports | 28 | 28 |
| Switching Fabric | — | 160 Gbps |
| Forwarding Throughput | — | 119 Mpps |
| Redundant PSU | Not specified | Dual hot-swap N+1 |
| Management Platform | Omada SDN (cloud/on-prem) | Managed (PF link-local signaling) |
| VLAN / QoS / ACL | 802.1Q VLAN, 802.1p/DSCP QoS, ACL | — |
| Authentication | 802.1x, RADIUS/TACACS+ | — |
| Spanning Tree | STP/RSTP/MSTP | — |
| Mounting | — | Rack |
| Warranty | — | 5-Year |
| Weight | — | 16.49 lb |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the SG2428P or the X530DP-28GHXM-900?
The HV-X530DP-28GHXM-900 is the stronger choice when deploying large-scale, high-draw camera systems that require uninterrupted PoE power and high-capacity uplinks. Its 1480W PoE++ budget is 5.9× greater than the SG2428P's 250W, its 60W-per-port ceiling supports 802.3bt Class 6 devices the SG2428P cannot power, and its dual hot-swap N+1 PSU bays eliminate single-point power failure — a capability the SG2428P lacks entirely. The 4 × 10G SFP+ uplinks and 160 Gbps / 119 Mpps fabric provide headroom the SG2428P's all-gigabit architecture cannot match. The SG2428P is appropriate for smaller installs — 24 standard IP cameras on a 250W budget — where Omada SDN's well-documented VLAN, QoS, ACL, and RADIUS/TACACS+ feature set offers richer documented management control than the HV unit's spec sheet provides. Installers standardized on Omada SDN or constrained by budget should consider the SG2428P; those running Hanwha Wisenet VMS platforms or high-density PoE++ camera deployments should select the HV-X530DP-28GHXM-900.
Is the SG2428P or HV-X530DP-28GHXM-900 better for large camera deployments with high-wattage PTZ or multi-sensor cameras?
The HV-X530DP-28GHXM-900 is the better fit. Its 1480W PoE++ budget and 60W-per-port ceiling under 802.3bt accommodate high-draw PTZ cameras, multi-sensor panoramic units, and heated-dome cameras. The SG2428P's 250W PoE+ budget and 30W-per-port 802.3at ceiling would be quickly exhausted in such a deployment.
Which switch offers better protection against a power supply failure during a live surveillance deployment?
The HV-X530DP-28GHXM-900 provides dual hot-swap PSU bays with N+1 failover, allowing one power supply to fail or be serviced while the switch and all connected cameras remain powered. The SG2428P has no redundant PSU specified in its provided specifications, making it a single point of power failure.
Does the SG2428P support the same management and security features as the HV-X530DP-28GHXM-900?
The SG2428P has explicitly documented management features including 802.1Q VLAN, STP/RSTP/MSTP, IGMP Snooping, 802.1p/DSCP QoS, ACL, LACP, Static Routing, and 802.1x/RADIUS/TACACS+ authentication under the Omada SDN platform. The HV-X530DP-28GHXM-900's management spec notes 'managed Ethernet switch' and 'PF link-local signaling' but does not enumerate equivalent feature-level details in the provided specifications, so a direct feature-for-feature comparison cannot be made from available data.
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.