Pelco SRXF3-12360-ERS vs Pelco SRXF3-12360-ES: Specification Comparison
Both the Pelco SRXF3-12360-ERS and SRXF3-12360-ES belong to the Sarix Fisheye 3 series and are 12MP fisheye cameras sharing the same sensor resolution, lens, frame rate, PoE+ power, analytics engine, and ONVIF compliance. They target the same open-area panoramic surveillance use case and are genuine cross-shop candidates. The key differentiator is integrated IR illumination on the ERS versus the ES's dual IP66/IP67 ingress rating and a specified 0.10 lux minimum illumination figure, making the choice largely site-condition driven.
In This Guide
How do the imaging specs compare?
Both cameras share a 12MP sensor resolving 3840×2160, a 2.7 mm f/2.5 lens (aperture F2.0 in product specs), 180°/360° field of view, 12.5 fps at full resolution, WDR up to 83 dB, and dual H.265/H.264 compression. In these core imaging parameters the two models are identical, so neither holds an intrinsic daylight imaging advantage over the other.
The split occurs in low-light capability. The SRXF3-12360-ERS specifies integrated IR illumination at 850 nm with Day/Night operation, allowing active illumination in zero-ambient-light environments; no minimum lux figure is listed in the provided specs. The SRXF3-12360-ES does not list integrated IR (the sourced spec sheet explicitly states 'IR Range: None') but does carry a minimum illumination figure of 0.10 lux, indicating a sensitive sensor in available-light conditions. Buyers needing zero-light coverage should note the ERS's active IR; buyers in environments with at least trace ambient light may find the ES's 0.10 lux passive sensitivity sufficient.
What about installation and environment?
Both cameras are PoE+ (802.3at) Class 3, rated IP66, IK10, and operate from -40°C to +60°C, so the baseline outdoor deployment envelope is identical. The SRXF3-12360-ERS adds a NEMA 4X enclosure rating, providing a certified standard for hosed-down or corrosive-wash industrial environments beyond the IP66 criterion alone. The SRXF3-12360-ES adds an IP67 rating (temporary full immersion to 1 m), which is absent from the ERS spec sheet; NEMA 4X is not listed for the ES.
Both support Wall, Ceiling, Pole, Pendant, and Corner mounting. Physical dimensions are listed only for the ERS (153.5 mm × 153.5 mm × 71.3 mm); the ES lists 6" × 6" × 2.81" (≈152 mm × 152 mm × 71 mm), making them effectively the same footprint. Weight with wall mount is 1.001 kg for both. Housing color is White on both models.
Which fits your VMS and analytics better?
Both cameras are ONVIF Profile S and Profile T compliant, carry Pelco Smart Analytics with 8 behavior detection modes, support microSD on-board storage, include a microphone for audio input, and provide HTTPS encryption. Memory is listed as 4 GB RAM / 4 GB Flash on both. In every integration dimension captured in the provided specifications the two models are identical; there is no spec-documented difference in VMS compatibility, analytics depth, audio output capability, or edge storage capacity between them.
Storage temperature for the on-board microSD/flash is listed as -10°C to +70°C on both units, which is narrower than the camera's own operating range and should be factored into deployments at the temperature extremes. Both models list Surface Mount and In-Ceiling Mount certifications in addition to the five mount-type options.
Which should you choose: the SRXF3-12360-ERS or the SRXF3-12360-ES?
Our take: The SRXF3-12360-ERS is the stronger choice when the deployment site has periods of complete darkness and requires active illumination, because it includes integrated 850 nm IR while the SRXF3-12360-ES specs explicitly list no IR range. Conversely, the SRXF3-12360-ES is preferable in wash-down or temporary-immersion environments: it carries an IP67 rating (absent from the ERS spec sheet), while the ERS counters with a NEMA 4X certification (absent from the ES spec sheet). The ES also documents a 0.10 lux minimum illumination, a figure not provided for the ERS. In every other measured parameter—12MP at 3840×2160, 2.7 mm f/2.5 lens, 12.5 fps, PoE+ Class 3, IK10, -40°C to +60°C, ONVIF Profile S/T, 8-behavior analytics, microSD, and 5-year warranty—the two models are spec-identical. Choose the ERS for zero-light IR coverage or NEMA-rated industrial enclosures; choose the ES where immersion resistance or passive low-light sensitivity (0.10 lux) is the priority.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Pelco SRXF3-12360-ERS | Pelco SRXF3-12360-ES |
|---|---|---|
| Series | Sarix Fisheye 3 | Sarix Fisheye 3 |
| Resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Max Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Lens / Focal Length | 2.7 mm f/2.5, F2.0 aperture | 2.7 mm f/2.5, F2.0 aperture |
| Field of View | 180° / 360° | 180° / 360° |
| Min Illumination | — | 0.10 lux |
| IR Illumination | Integrated IR, 850 nm, Day/Night | None (per spec sheet) |
| WDR | Up to 83 dB | Up to 83 dB |
| Max Frame Rate | 12.5 fps (full resolution) | 12.5 fps (full resolution) |
| Video Compression | H.265 / H.264 | H.265 / H.264 |
| IP Rating | IP66, NEMA 4X | IP66, IP67 |
| Impact Rating | IK10 | IK10 |
| Operating Temperature | -40°C to +60°C | -40°C to +60°C |
| Power Input / PoE Class | PoE+ (802.3at), Class 3 | PoE+ (802.3at), Class 3 |
| Edge Storage | microSD | microSD |
| Audio | Microphone supported | Microphone supported |
| ONVIF Compliance | Profile S, Profile T | Profile S, Profile T |
| Analytics | Pelco Smart Analytics, 8 behaviors | Pelco Smart Analytics, 8 behaviors |
| Dimensions | 153.5 mm × 153.5 mm × 71.3 mm | 6" × 6" × 2.81" (≈152 × 152 × 71 mm) |
| Weight (with wall mount) | 1.001 kg (2.21 lb) | 1.001 kg (2.21 lb) |
| Housing Color | White | White |
| Warranty | 5-year | 5-year |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the SRXF3-12360-ERS or the SRXF3-12360-ES?
The SRXF3-12360-ERS is the stronger choice when the deployment site has periods of complete darkness and requires active illumination, because it includes integrated 850 nm IR while the SRXF3-12360-ES specs explicitly list no IR range. Conversely, the SRXF3-12360-ES is preferable in wash-down or temporary-immersion environments: it carries an IP67 rating (absent from the ERS spec sheet), while the ERS counters with a NEMA 4X certification (absent from the ES spec sheet). The ES also documents a 0.10 lux minimum illumination, a figure not provided for the ERS. In every other measured parameter—12MP at 3840×2160, 2.7 mm f/2.5 lens, 12.5 fps, PoE+ Class 3, IK10, -40°C to +60°C, ONVIF Profile S/T, 8-behavior analytics, microSD, and 5-year warranty—the two models are spec-identical. Choose the ERS for zero-light IR coverage or NEMA-rated industrial enclosures; choose the ES where immersion resistance or passive low-light sensitivity (0.10 lux) is the priority.
Is the SRXF3-12360-ERS or SRXF3-12360-ES better for low-light or nighttime surveillance?
The SRXF3-12360-ERS includes integrated 850 nm IR illumination for active zero-light operation. The SRXF3-12360-ES has no listed IR (spec sheet states 'IR Range: None') but specifies a 0.10 lux minimum illumination. For complete darkness without supplemental lighting, the ERS is the specified choice; for dimly lit areas with some ambient light, the ES's 0.10 lux rating may be sufficient.
Which model is better rated for wet or washdown environments?
The SRXF3-12360-ES adds an IP67 rating (temporary immersion to 1 m) on top of the shared IP66 rating, making it the better-specified choice for hose-down or flooding-risk installations. The SRXF3-12360-ERS carries a NEMA 4X certification (not listed for the ES), which covers corrosive-wash industrial enclosures. Neither NEMA 4X nor IP67 is present on both—select based on which standard your AHJ or facility specification requires.
Do both cameras work with the same VMS platforms and analytics features?
Yes. Both are ONVIF Profile S and Profile T compliant and run Pelco Smart Analytics with 8 behavior detection modes. No spec-documented difference in VMS compatibility, analytics capability, audio input, on-board microSD storage, or HTTPS encryption exists between the two models based on the provided specifications.
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.