Hanwha PNM-7082RVD vs i-PRO X35402-F2L: Specification Comparison
Both the Hanwha PNM-7082RVD and the i-PRO WV-X35402-F2L are outdoor-rated, vandal-resistant IP dome cameras targeting commercial and infrastructure installations. The Hanwha is a dual-sensor 2×2MP (4MP aggregate) motorized varifocal unit; the i-PRO is a single-sensor 4MP fixed-lens compact dome. Both carry IP66 and IK10 ratings, PoE power, H.265 compression, and ONVIF compatibility, making them genuine cross-shop candidates for integrators evaluating perimeter or facility coverage in the same resolution class.
In This Guide
How do the imaging specs compare?
The PNM-7082RVD uses two 1/2.8" CMOS sensors, each delivering 2MP (1920×1080) at 30fps, with a motorized varifocal lens spanning 3–6mm (2×) and a horizontal field of view that adjusts from 107° (wide) to 56° (tele). Its extremeWDR is rated at 120dB, and minimum illumination is 0.035 lux color / 0 lux with IR active, with IR coverage rated to 15m typical and 25m scene-dependent. The dual-sensor architecture enables a wide panoramic view while still providing optical zoom adjustment for installation flexibility.
The WV-X35402-F2L employs a single approx. 1/2.8" CMOS sensor producing up to 2560×1440 (4MP) at 25/30fps with a fixed 2.4mm lens at a fixed 121° horizontal FOV. Its Super Dynamic WDR reaches 132dB (at level 31), exceeding the Hanwha's 120dB rating. Minimum illumination is specified at 0.07 lux color and 0.06 lux B&W, versus 0.035 lux color for the Hanwha. IR range is rated 14m at 30IRE / 10m at 50IRE. The fixed lens offers no optical zoom adjustment but provides a wider-angle, single unified image rather than the dual-channel composite of the Hanwha.
What about installation and environment?
Both cameras share IP66 and IK10 ratings and NEMA 4X compliance, making them suitable for outdoor vandal-prone environments. The Hanwha PNM-7082RVD specifies an operating range of -40°C to +55°C, while the i-PRO WV-X35402-F2L extends to -40°C to +60°C — a 5°C higher upper limit. The i-PRO additionally carries EN50155, JIS E 5006, IEC62236, and EN50121 railway/vehicle certifications, plus a wind resistance rating of up to 40 m/s (approx. 89 mph); the Hanwha datasheet does not list equivalent rail or wind-load certifications.
On power, the Hanwha requires PoE+ (IEEE 802.3at, Class 4) at up to 17W maximum, whereas the i-PRO operates on standard PoE (IEEE 802.3af) at a maximum of 8.6W — a meaningful infrastructure difference if existing switches are 802.3af-only. The Hanwha is physically larger at 215×135×93.2mm and 1,330g versus the i-PRO's 109×119×53mm footprint and approximately 475g, which may favor the i-PRO in tight or vehicle-mounted installations. The Hanwha's pan/tilt/rotate range (0–355°/0–78°/0–180°) provides broad positioning flexibility; the i-PRO adjusts over -45° to +45° pan, 0° to +90° tilt, -90° to +90° yaw.
Which fits your VMS and analytics better?
Both cameras support ONVIF. The Hanwha carries ONVIF Profile S and T; the i-PRO supports ONVIF Profiles G, M, S, and T — the addition of Profile G (on-board recording/retrieval) and Profile M (metadata/analytics) is relevant for VMS platforms that leverage those profiles. Both support up to 512GB microSD/SDXC edge storage. The Hanwha streams to up to 20 unicast users across up to 10 profiles; the i-PRO supports up to 14 simultaneous users. Protocol breadth is comparable, though the i-PRO adds SFTP and MQTT natively per its spec sheet.
On analytics, the i-PRO lists AI motion, face, people, vehicle, mask, and occupancy detection plus AI Sound Classification (gunshot, yell, vehicle horn, glass break) built in. The Hanwha's listed analytics are motion detection, virtual line/direction, intrusion, and loitering — with no AI sound classification stated in the provided specs. Audio on the i-PRO uses a built-in microphone; the Hanwha requires the optional SPM-4210 I/O box for both audio in and out, as well as for alarm I/O. Security credentials differ: the Hanwha specifies TPM 2.0 at FIPS 140-2 level 2; the i-PRO specifies FIPS 140-2 level 3 via NXP EdgeLock SE050F with a GlobalSign pre-installed device certificate.
Which should you choose: the PNM-7082RVD or the X35402-F2L?
Our take: The WV-X35402-F2L is the stronger choice when the deployment demands railway/vehicle certification, standard PoE infrastructure, deeper AI analytics, or the highest security assurance level. Its Super Dynamic WDR reaches 132dB versus the Hanwha's 120dB, it draws only 8.6W on 802.3af versus up to 17W on 802.3at, and its FIPS 140-2 level 3 hardware security module exceeds the Hanwha's level 2 TPM. It also adds ONVIF Profiles G and M plus built-in AI sound classification absent from the Hanwha's stated specs, and its operating ceiling extends 5°C higher (+60°C vs +55°C) with EN50155 rail certification. Conversely, the PNM-7082RVD is the better fit when adjustable field of view is required: its 3–6mm motorized varifocal lens allows optical zoom tuning post-installation that the i-PRO's fixed 2.4mm lens cannot provide, and its 25m IR range and 0.035 lux sensitivity give an edge in very long-range low-light scenes. Choose the i-PRO for transit, infrastructure, or high-security fixed-angle installations; choose the Hanwha where lens flexibility or extended IR reach matters more.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Hanwha PNM-7082RVD | i-PRO X35402-F2L |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 2×2MP (1920×1080 per channel) | 4MP (2560×1440 max) |
| Image Sensor | 1/2.8" CMOS ×2 channels | Approx. 1/2.8" CMOS ×1 |
| Lens / Focal Length | 3–6mm motorized varifocal (2×) | 2.4mm fixed |
| Horizontal Field of View | 107° (wide) – 56° (tele) | 121° (16:9) |
| Min. Illumination (Color) | 0.035 lux | 0.07 lux |
| IR Range | 15m typical / 25m scene-dependent | 14m (30IRE) / 10m (50IRE) |
| WDR | extremeWDR 120dB | Super Dynamic 132dB (level 31) |
| Max Frame Rate | 30fps @ 2MP | 25/30fps |
| Video Compression | H.265, H.264 (Main/Baseline/High), MJPEG | H.265, H.264 |
| IP / NEMA Rating | IP66/IP67, NEMA 4X | IP66, NEMA 4X (UL50E) |
| IK / Impact Rating | IK10 | IK10 |
| Operating Temperature | -40°C to +55°C | -40°C to +60°C |
| Power Input / PoE Class | PoE+ (802.3at), Class 4, max 17W | PoE (802.3af), Class 0, max 8.6W |
| Edge Storage | microSD/SDHC/SDXC up to 512GB | microSDXC up to 512GB |
| Audio | Via optional SPM-4210 I/O box | Built-in microphone |
| On-board AI Analytics | Motion, virtual line, intrusion, loitering | AI face, people, vehicle, mask, occupancy, sound classification |
| ONVIF Profiles | S, T | G, M, S, T |
| FIPS Security Level | FIPS 140-2 Level 2 (TPM 2.0) | FIPS 140-2 Level 3 (NXP EdgeLock SE050F) |
| Rail / Vehicle Certification | Not specified | EN50155, JIS E 5006, IEC62236, EN50121 |
| Dimensions (W×D×H) | 215×135×93.2mm (8.46"×5.31"×3.67") | 109×119×53mm (4.30"×4.69"×2.09") |
| Weight | 1,330g (2.93 lbs) | Approx. 475g (1.05 lbs) |
| Warranty | 3-year | 5-year |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the PNM-7082RVD or the X35402-F2L?
The WV-X35402-F2L is the stronger choice when the deployment demands railway/vehicle certification, standard PoE infrastructure, deeper AI analytics, or the highest security assurance level. Its Super Dynamic WDR reaches 132dB versus the Hanwha's 120dB, it draws only 8.6W on 802.3af versus up to 17W on 802.3at, and its FIPS 140-2 level 3 hardware security module exceeds the Hanwha's level 2 TPM. It also adds ONVIF Profiles G and M plus built-in AI sound classification absent from the Hanwha's stated specs, and its operating ceiling extends 5°C higher (+60°C vs +55°C) with EN50155 rail certification. Conversely, the PNM-7082RVD is the better fit when adjustable field of view is required: its 3–6mm motorized varifocal lens allows optical zoom tuning post-installation that the i-PRO's fixed 2.4mm lens cannot provide, and its 25m IR range and 0.035 lux sensitivity give an edge in very long-range low-light scenes. Choose the i-PRO for transit, infrastructure, or high-security fixed-angle installations; choose the Hanwha where lens flexibility or extended IR reach matters more.
Is the PNM-7082RVD or WV-X35402-F2L better for low-light performance?
The Hanwha PNM-7082RVD specifies a lower minimum color illumination — 0.035 lux versus the i-PRO's 0.07 lux — and its IR reach is rated up to 25m scene-dependent versus the i-PRO's 14m at 30IRE. On those stated specs, the Hanwha has an advantage in very dark, long-range scenes. However, the i-PRO's WDR reaches 132dB versus 120dB, which benefits high-contrast mixed lighting conditions.
Can I power either camera from a standard 802.3af PoE switch?
Only the i-PRO WV-X35402-F2L can run on standard 802.3af PoE (maximum 8.6W). The Hanwha PNM-7082RVD requires PoE+ (IEEE 802.3at, Class 4) at up to 17W maximum. If your existing switch infrastructure is 802.3af-only, the i-PRO is the compatible choice without switch upgrades or midspan injectors.
Which camera is better suited for rail or vehicle installations?
The i-PRO WV-X35402-F2L is explicitly certified for railway and vehicle applications per EN50155, JIS E 5006, IEC62236, and EN50121, and carries a wind resistance rating of up to 40 m/s. The Hanwha PNM-7082RVD does not list equivalent rail or wind-load certifications in the provided specifications. For transit or rolling-stock deployments requiring those certifications, the i-PRO is the specified-compliant option.
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.