Hanwha C9253 vs i-PRO X66700-Z3LS: Specification Comparison
Both the Hanwha XNP-C9253 and the i-PRO WV-X66700-Z3LS are 8MP (4K) outdoor PTZ dome cameras aimed at wide-area surveillance applications requiring optical zoom, AI-driven analytics, and all-weather durability. They compete in the same resolution class and form factor, making them genuine cross-shop candidates for integrators specifying perimeter coverage, traffic monitoring, or critical-infrastructure PTZ deployments. This comparison is based strictly on published specifications for each model.
In This Guide
How do the imaging specs compare?
Both cameras use a 1/2.8" CMOS sensor and deliver 3840×2160 resolution. The Hanwha XNP-C9253 offers a 25x optical zoom (5–125mm, F1.6–F3.73), with minimum illumination of 0.1 lux color / 0.01 lux B/W and Extreme WDR rated at 120 dB. It supports up to 60fps (frame rate listed in features) with 30fps at full 8MP. The i-PRO WV-X66700-Z3LS provides a 30x optical zoom (4.5–135mm, F1.8–F4.7) with an extra-zoom mode up to 90x at 1280×720, and minimum illumination of 0.13 lux color / 0 lux B/W (with IR). Its Super Dynamic WDR is rated at a maximum of 132 dB at level 31.
The most significant imaging differentiator is IR illumination. The i-PRO WV-X66700-Z3LS includes built-in IR LED illumination rated at 280m (30 IRE) / 200m (50 IRE), enabling true zero-lux B/W operation without supplemental lighting. The Hanwha XNP-C9253 specifies an IR distance of 5m in its product attributes and indicates no built-in IR illuminator in its datasheet notes, meaning external IR illumination is required for extended low-light coverage. For DORI, the i-PRO identifies targets at up to 352m (tele) versus the Hanwha's 324.7m (tele), a modest advantage at maximum zoom.
What about installation and environment?
Both cameras carry IP66 and IK10 ratings and are certified to NEMA 4X. The Hanwha XNP-C9253 adds NEMA-TS2 compliance (sections 2.2.7, 2.2.8, 2.2.9), relevant for traffic and roadway deployments. Its operating temperature range is -40°C to +55°C. The i-PRO WV-X66700-Z3LS operates from -30°C to +60°C and specifies wind resistance up to 40 m/s (~89 mph), a parameter not stated in the Hanwha spec sheet. The Hanwha is also NEMA-TS2 certified, giving it a slight edge in environments subject to the most extreme cold.
Power requirements differ materially. The Hanwha XNP-C9253 draws a maximum of 25.5W and is powered via PoE+ (IEEE 802.3at, Class 4). The i-PRO WV-X66700-Z3LS consumes 45.9W and requires PoE++ (Class 6), which demands a compatible Class 6 midspan or switch. Installers must verify infrastructure capability before specifying the i-PRO. The Hanwha is slightly larger in height (293.3mm vs 205mm) but lighter (3,200g vs ~3,000g without attachment). The Hanwha includes a water-removal spin-dry and lens heater function; the i-PRO spec sheet does not state these features.
Which fits your VMS and analytics better?
Both cameras support ONVIF Profiles S, G, T, and M, and both stream H.265, H.264, and MJPEG. The Hanwha XNP-C9253 supports up to 20 unicast users and 128 multicast users across up to 10 stream profiles, and exposes SUNAPI and Wisenet APIs in addition to ONVIF. The i-PRO WV-X66700-Z3LS supports up to 14 simultaneous users and includes audio compression via G.726, G.711, and AAC-LC, with physical 3.5mm audio input and output jacks plus 3 alarm I/O terminals built in. The Hanwha's alarm I/O requires the optional SPM-4210 I/O box; audio output capability is not confirmed in the provided spec data.
On-board AI analytics differ in emphasis. The Hanwha XNP-C9253 provides AI auto-tracking (persons and vehicles), object detection, virtual line/area crossing, classified object attributes (car/bus/truck/motorcycle/bicycle/face/license plate), and WiseNR II noise reduction. It also includes AI Sound Classification is not listed. The i-PRO WV-X66700-Z3LS includes AI motion, face, people, vehicle detection, occupancy, and adds AI Sound Classification (gunshot, yell, vehicle horn, glass break). Edge storage on both is microSD; the Hanwha supports dual microSD slots up to 512GB each (1TB total), while the i-PRO supports a single microSDXC up to 512GB. The Hanwha also specifies TPM with FIPS 140-2 Level 2 certification for secure storage, and includes encrypted SD card and secure boot; the i-PRO lists signed firmware but does not detail equivalent TPM certification in the provided spec data.
Which should you choose: the C9253 or the X66700-Z3LS?
Our take: The XNP-C9253 is the stronger choice when PoE+ infrastructure, extreme cold tolerance, or cybersecurity certification depth are primary constraints; the WV-X66700-Z3LS is the stronger choice when built-in long-range IR illumination, higher WDR headroom, or audio event classification are the deciding factors. Key spec deltas: the i-PRO's built-in IR reaches 280m vs the Hanwha's 5m (external illuminator required for extended night coverage); the i-PRO's Super Dynamic WDR reaches 132 dB vs the Hanwha's 120 dB; the Hanwha operates to -40°C vs the i-PRO's -30°C floor. The Hanwha's dual-slot edge storage totals 1TB vs the i-PRO's single-slot 512GB, and the Hanwha carries TPM FIPS 140-2 Level 2 certification. The i-PRO's PoE++ Class 6 requirement (45.9W) versus the Hanwha's PoE+ Class 4 (25.5W) is a meaningful infrastructure cost at scale. The i-PRO also carries a 5-year warranty vs the Hanwha's 3-year.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Hanwha C9253 | i-PRO X66700-Z3LS |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 3840×2160 (8MP) | 3840×2160 (8MP) |
| Image Sensor | 1/2.8" CMOS | Approx. 1/2.8" CMOS |
| Optical Zoom / Focal Length | 25x / 5–125mm | 30x / 4.5–135mm |
| Max Aperture (Wide / Tele) | F1.6 / F3.73 | F1.8 / F4.7 |
| Min Illumination (Color / B/W) | 0.1 lux / 0.01 lux | 0.13 lux / 0 lux (with IR) |
| Built-in IR Range | 5m (external illuminator needed for longer range) | 280m (30 IRE) / 200m (50 IRE) |
| WDR | Extreme WDR 120 dB | Super Dynamic max 132 dB (level 31) |
| Max Frame Rate | 60fps (30fps @ 8MP) | Not specified at 8MP in provided specs |
| DORI Identify (Tele) | 324.7m | 352.0m |
| Pan Speed (Preset / Manual Max) | 700°/s preset / 250°/s manual | 700°/s preset / 150°/s manual |
| Tilt Speed (Preset / Manual Max) | 500°/s preset / 250°/s manual | 500°/s preset / 150°/s manual |
| Power Input / PoE Class | PoE+ IEEE 802.3at / Class 4 | PoE++ / Class 6 |
| Max Power Consumption | 25.5W | 45.9W |
| Operating Temperature | -40°C to +55°C | -30°C to +60°C |
| IP / IK Rating | IP66 / IK10 | IP66 / IK10 |
| Edge Storage | Dual microSD/SDXC up to 512GB × 2 (1TB) | Single microSDXC up to 512GB |
| Audio I/O | Not confirmed in provided specs (optional I/O box for alarm) | 3.5mm stereo mic in + line out; G.726 / G.711 / AAC-LC |
| ONVIF Profiles | S / G / T / M | S / G / T / M |
| Video Compression | H.265, H.264, MJPEG | H.265, H.264, MJPEG |
| Cybersecurity — Secure Storage | TPM with FIPS 140-2 Level 2, encrypted SD | Signed firmware (TPM not stated in provided specs) |
| Dimensions (Diameter × Height) | ø158 × 293.3mm | ø167mm × 205mm |
| Weight | 3,200g | Approx. 3,000g (without attachment) |
| Warranty | 3 years | 5 years |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the C9253 or the X66700-Z3LS?
The XNP-C9253 is the stronger choice when PoE+ infrastructure, extreme cold tolerance, or cybersecurity certification depth are primary constraints; the WV-X66700-Z3LS is the stronger choice when built-in long-range IR illumination, higher WDR headroom, or audio event classification are the deciding factors. Key spec deltas: the i-PRO's built-in IR reaches 280m vs the Hanwha's 5m (external illuminator required for extended night coverage); the i-PRO's Super Dynamic WDR reaches 132 dB vs the Hanwha's 120 dB; the Hanwha operates to -40°C vs the i-PRO's -30°C floor. The Hanwha's dual-slot edge storage totals 1TB vs the i-PRO's single-slot 512GB, and the Hanwha carries TPM FIPS 140-2 Level 2 certification. The i-PRO's PoE++ Class 6 requirement (45.9W) versus the Hanwha's PoE+ Class 4 (25.5W) is a meaningful infrastructure cost at scale. The i-PRO also carries a 5-year warranty vs the Hanwha's 3-year.
Is the XNP-C9253 or WV-X66700-Z3LS better for low-light and nighttime coverage?
The WV-X66700-Z3LS has a clear advantage for unlit or poorly lit scenes: it includes built-in IR LEDs rated at 280m (30 IRE) enabling 0 lux B/W operation without any supplemental lighting. The XNP-C9253 lists a minimum illumination of 0.01 lux B/W but its built-in IR range is specified at only 5m, and its datasheet notes indicate an external IR illuminator is required for extended night coverage. If the site lacks supplemental IR, the i-PRO is the lower-risk choice.
Can I power either camera from a standard PoE switch?
No — not both. The Hanwha XNP-C9253 draws up to 25.5W and runs on PoE+ (IEEE 802.3at, Class 4), which most modern managed switches support. The i-PRO WV-X66700-Z3LS consumes 45.9W and requires PoE++ (Class 6 / IEEE 802.3bt). Standard PoE or PoE+ switches will not supply sufficient power for the i-PRO; a Class 6-capable midspan injector or PoE++ switch port is required.
Which camera is better suited for traffic or roadway deployments?
The Hanwha XNP-C9253 carries explicit NEMA-TS2 certification (sections 2.2.7, 2.2.8, 2.2.9), which is specifically referenced in traffic cabinet and roadway-controller standards. It also includes NTCIP 1205 protocol support. The i-PRO WV-X66700-Z3LS lists NEMA-TS2 under Other Standards but does not enumerate the specific subsections in the provided spec data. Both carry IP66/IK10/NEMA 4X. For jurisdictions or procurement authorities that require documented NEMA-TS2 subsection compliance, the Hanwha spec sheet is more explicit.
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.