Hanwha QNP-6250H vs i-PRO X66300-Z4LS: Specification Comparison
Both the Hanwha QNP-6250H and the i-PRO WV-X66300-Z4LS are 2MP outdoor PTZ dome cameras designed for professional IP surveillance deployments. Each offers continuous 360° pan, day/night ICR, IP66/IK10 rating, and H.265/H.264 compression over PoE. The comparison below examines how their sensor performance, optical zoom range, IR illumination, power requirements, AI analytics depth, and integration capabilities differ — giving integrators and IT buyers a spec-driven basis for selecting the appropriate unit for their specific application.
In This Guide
How do the imaging specs compare?
Both cameras share a 1/2.8-inch CMOS sensor and deliver 1920×1080 at up to 60 fps, so base resolution and frame rate are identical. The optical zoom ranges diverge significantly: the QNP-6250H provides 25× optical zoom (4.44–111 mm, F1.6–F3.9) with a digital 32× for a combined 800× total, while the WV-X66300-Z4LS offers 40× optical zoom (4.25–170 mm, F1.6–F4.95) and extends to 60× extra zoom at 1280×720, reaching a 170 mm tele end. This gives the i-PRO a notably longer tele DORI detect range — 2,199.9 m versus 1,471.3 m for the Hanwha — though wide-end detect figures are nearly identical (60.3 m vs. 60.7 m).
In low-light performance the QNP-6250H specifies 0.05 Lux color and 0.005 Lux B/W minimum illumination; the WV-X66300-Z4LS specifies 0.006 Lux in B/W mode with IR LED active. Directly comparable color-mode lux for the i-PRO is not stated in the provided specs. IR reach is a clear differentiator: the i-PRO rates its IR illuminators to 350 m (30 IRE) / 250 m (50 IRE), whereas the QNP-6250H lists IR Viewable Length and IR LED fields as 'None' in the spec sheet, indicating it relies on external IR or ambient light rather than an integrated IR emitter. WDR is rated at 120 dB for the Hanwha versus a maximum 144 dB (Super Dynamic On, Level 31) for the i-PRO.
What about installation and environment?
Both units carry IP66 and IK10 ratings and NEMA 4X certification, providing equivalent ingress protection and vandal resistance for outdoor deployments. Temperature tolerance differs: the QNP-6250H is rated for -35 °C to +55 °C operation, while the WV-X66300-Z4LS is rated for -50 °C to +60 °C — a broader envelope at both ends that matters for arctic or extreme-heat installations. The i-PRO also publishes a wind-resistance rating of up to 40 m/s (~89 mph), a figure not stated in the Hanwha spec sheet.
Power requirements are a material installation consideration. The QNP-6250H draws a maximum of 23 W and is powered by PoE+ (IEEE 802.3at, Class 4), which is supported by most mid-range managed switches. The WV-X66300-Z4LS requires PoE++ (IEEE 802.3bt) at 45.9 W — almost double the load — necessitating a PoE++ (Class 6) switch or injector, which typically adds cost and limits port selection. Physical size also differs: the Hanwha measures ø204.3 × 265 mm and weighs 2,700 g, versus ø167 × 205 mm and approximately 3,000 g for the i-PRO, so the i-PRO is more compact in diameter but slightly heavier.
Which fits your VMS and analytics better?
Both cameras support ONVIF Profiles S, G, and T, ensuring baseline VMS compatibility. The QNP-6250H adds ONVIF Profile G and Wisenet SUNAPI/open platform support. The WV-X66300-Z4LS adds ONVIF Profile M, which is relevant for metadata and analytics interoperability, and declares an Ambarella CV25m SoC. On-board AI analytics differ substantially: the i-PRO specifies AI Video Motion, Face Detection, People Detection, Vehicle Detection, and AI Sound Classification (gunshot, yell, vehicle horn, glass break), while the QNP-6250H lists directional detection, enter/exit, virtual line, motion detection, and tampering — no AI-classified audio events.
Audio capability is another differentiator. The WV-X66300-Z4LS includes a 3.5 mm stereo audio input and output, G.726/G.711/AAC-LC compression, and full-duplex audio transmission, plus three alarm inputs and one alarm output. The QNP-6250H lists Audio Out and Audio Compression as 'None' in its spec sheet, with audio detection noted as requiring an optional external I/O box (SPM-4210). Edge storage maximums also differ: the Hanwha supports microSD/SDHC/SDXC up to 256 GB, while the i-PRO supports microSDXC up to 512 GB. Simultaneous user streams are 20 unicast for the Hanwha versus up to 14 for the i-PRO.
Which should you choose: the QNP-6250H or the X66300-Z4LS?
Our take: The WV-X66300-Z4LS is the stronger choice when tele-range identification, onboard AI classification, or integrated audio are primary requirements; the QNP-6250H is preferable where PoE+ infrastructure is fixed or budget-constrained. Key spec deltas: the i-PRO's 40× optical zoom (versus 25×) pushes tele DORI detect to 2,199.9 m — nearly 50% farther than the Hanwha's 1,471.3 m — and its IR illuminators reach 350 m versus no stated integrated IR on the QNP-6250H. The i-PRO's WDR ceiling of 144 dB exceeds the Hanwha's 120 dB, and its AI analytics suite adds face, people, vehicle, and classified sound detection absent from the Hanwha. However, the i-PRO demands PoE++ at 45.9 W versus PoE+ at 23 W max for the Hanwha, which can require switch infrastructure upgrades. The Hanwha carries a narrower operating temperature floor (-35 °C vs. -50 °C) and a 3-year warranty versus the i-PRO's 5-year warranty.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Hanwha QNP-6250H | i-PRO X66300-Z4LS |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1920×1080 (2MP) | 1920×1080 (2MP) |
| Image Sensor | 1/2.8" CMOS | Approx. 1/2.8 type CMOS |
| Optical Zoom / Focal Length | 25× / 4.44–111 mm | 40× / 4.25–170 mm |
| Extra / Digital Zoom | 32× digital (800× total) | 60× extra zoom (at 720p) |
| Max. Aperture | F1.6 (Wide) / F3.9 (Tele) | F1.6 (Wide) / F4.95 (Tele) |
| Min. Illumination | 0.05 Lux color / 0.005 Lux B/W | 0.006 Lux B/W (IR LED on); color not stated |
| Built-in IR / IR Range | None stated | Yes / 350 m (30 IRE), 250 m (50 IRE) |
| WDR | 120 dB | Max. 144 dB (Super Dynamic On, Level 31) |
| Max Frame Rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Video Compression | H.265, H.264, MJPEG | H.265, H.264, JPEG |
| IP Rating | IP66, NEMA 4X | IP66, NEMA 4X |
| Impact Rating | IK10 | IK10 |
| Operating Temperature | -35 °C to +55 °C | -50 °C to +60 °C |
| Power Input / PoE Class | PoE+ (IEEE 802.3at), Class 4, max 23 W | PoE++ (IEEE 802.3bt), Class 6, 45.9 W |
| Edge Storage | microSD/SDHC/SDXC up to 256 GB | microSDXC up to 512 GB |
| Audio | None (external I/O box required) | 3.5 mm in/out, G.711/G.726/AAC-LC, full duplex |
| ONVIF Profiles | S, G, T | G, M, S, T |
| AI / Onboard Analytics | Directional, enter/exit, virtual line, tampering, motion | Face, people, vehicle, AI VMD; AI sound classification |
| Pan Speed (Preset / Manual) | 700°/s preset / 0.024–200°/s manual | 700°/s preset / 0.065–150°/s manual |
| Tilt Range | 0° to 105° | -20° to +90° |
| Dimensions | ø204.3 × 265 mm | ø167 × 205 mm |
| Weight | 2,700 g (5.95 lb) | Approx. 3,000 g |
| Warranty | 3 years | 5 years |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the QNP-6250H or the X66300-Z4LS?
The WV-X66300-Z4LS is the stronger choice when tele-range identification, onboard AI classification, or integrated audio are primary requirements; the QNP-6250H is preferable where PoE+ infrastructure is fixed or budget-constrained. Key spec deltas: the i-PRO's 40× optical zoom (versus 25×) pushes tele DORI detect to 2,199.9 m — nearly 50% farther than the Hanwha's 1,471.3 m — and its IR illuminators reach 350 m versus no stated integrated IR on the QNP-6250H. The i-PRO's WDR ceiling of 144 dB exceeds the Hanwha's 120 dB, and its AI analytics suite adds face, people, vehicle, and classified sound detection absent from the Hanwha. However, the i-PRO demands PoE++ at 45.9 W versus PoE+ at 23 W max for the Hanwha, which can require switch infrastructure upgrades. The Hanwha carries a narrower operating temperature floor (-35 °C vs. -50 °C) and a 3-year warranty versus the i-PRO's 5-year warranty.
Is the QNP-6250H or WV-X66300-Z4LS better for low-light and long-range night surveillance?
The WV-X66300-Z4LS has an advantage on both counts. It integrates IR illuminators rated to 350 m (30 IRE), whereas the QNP-6250H's spec sheet lists its IR Viewable Length as 'None,' indicating no built-in IR emitter. The i-PRO also specifies a minimum illumination of 0.006 Lux (B/W with IR) and a maximum WDR of 144 dB, compared to the Hanwha's 0.005 Lux B/W (no IR stated) and 120 dB WDR. A comparable color-mode lux figure is not provided for the i-PRO in the available specs.
Can I power either camera from a standard PoE+ switch port?
Only the QNP-6250H can run on a standard PoE+ (IEEE 802.3at, Class 4) port at a maximum of 23 W. The WV-X66300-Z4LS requires PoE++ (IEEE 802.3bt, Class 6) at 45.9 W. If your installed switch infrastructure supports only 802.3at, the Hanwha is the compatible choice without hardware upgrades.
Which camera offers better onboard analytics and audio for perimeter detection?
The WV-X66300-Z4LS offers a broader onboard AI analytics suite — including face detection, people detection, vehicle detection, AI video motion, and AI sound classification (gunshot, yell, vehicle horn, glass break) — along with native two-way audio via 3.5 mm input/output at G.711/G.726/AAC-LC. The QNP-6250H provides directional detection, virtual line, enter/exit, and motion/tampering analytics, but its audio detection requires an optional external I/O box (SPM-4210) and the spec sheet lists Audio Out as 'None.' For integrated audio-plus-AI perimeter analytics, the i-PRO holds the advantage based on provided specifications.
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.