Geovision TBL8710-000 vs Geovision TBL8810-0010: Specification Comparison
Both the Geovision TBL8710-000 and TBL8810-0010 are 8MP H.265 IR bullet cameras targeting fixed-scene surveillance at identification-grade resolution. They share the same sensor class, compression standard, lens focal length, and ONVIF compatibility, making them genuine cross-shop candidates for integrators evaluating Geovision's bullet lineup. The comparison below examines where the two models diverge across imaging quality, physical installation requirements, and VMS/analytics integration — drawing exclusively from the specifications provided for each unit.
In This Guide
How do the imaging specs compare?
Both cameras deliver 8MP (3840×2160) resolution with a 4.3mm fixed lens offering 4.3× optical zoom, H.265 compression, and IR-based night vision at super-low-lux minimum illumination. WDR is listed as 'WDR Pro' on both models in the primary spec fields, though the lower-priority '_Wdr' field lists plain 'WDR' for each — no numeric dB value is provided for either unit, so a quantitative WDR comparison cannot be made from the available data.
On low-light handling, the TBL8810-0010 specifies 'IR illumination; Automatic day/night switching' explicitly in its IR_Lowlight field, while the TBL8710-000 lists only 'IR' with no mention of automatic day/night switching in the provided specs. Neither datasheet entry includes a rated IR range in metres, so IR throw distance cannot be compared. Resolution, compression efficiency, and lens characteristics are functionally identical between the two.
What about installation and environment?
Neither model's provided specifications include an IP ingress-protection rating, IK impact rating, operating temperature range, power draw, PoE class, dimensions, or weight. These are critical omissions for an outdoor or industrial deployment decision. Installers should consult the full datasheets (125-TBL8710-000.pdf and 84-TBL8810-0010.pdf respectively) before specifying either camera for exposed or temperature-extreme environments.
On mounting, the TBL8710-000 supports Wall and Soffit mount types, while the TBL8810-0010 supports Wall, Eave, and Pole mounting. The addition of pole-mount compatibility on the TBL8810-0010 gives it broader physical deployment flexibility for perimeter and parking applications. Both units share the same bullet form factor. Cable category differs: TBL8710-000 is catalogued under IPCAM; TBL8810-0010 under Accessories — this appears to be a catalogue-classification difference rather than a functional distinction.
Which fits your VMS and analytics better?
Both cameras are ONVIF-compliant and support RTSP streams, making either compatible with any standards-based VMS or NVR. The TBL8710-000 explicitly lists 'RTSP/ONVIF' under VMS compatibility; the TBL8810-0010 lists 'ONVIF-compliant systems.' Card Bullet 3 for the TBL8810-0010 also mentions PoE (802.3af/at) support, though this is sourced from a marketing bullet rather than a discrete spec field, so it should be verified against the full datasheet before being used as a procurement specification.
The most significant integration differentiator is edge analytics: the TBL8810-0010 carries an 'AI-based' analytics designation in the provided specs; no analytics capability is listed at all for the TBL8710-000. If on-camera AI analytics (motion classification, intrusion detection, object recognition) are required to reduce server-side processing load or to enable direct alerting without a full VMS, the TBL8810-0010 is the only model of the two with a stated analytics capability. Neither model lists audio input/output or on-board storage (SD card) in the provided specifications.
Which should you choose: the TBL8710-000 or the TBL8810-0010?
Our take: The TBL8810-0010 is the stronger choice when edge analytics, pole-mount flexibility, or explicit PoE standard confirmation matter to the deployment. The single most concrete spec delta is AI-based analytics: it is present on the TBL8810-0010 and absent entirely from the TBL8710-000's provided specifications. Second, the TBL8810-0010 supports three mount types (Wall, Eave, Pole) versus two on the TBL8710-000 (Wall, Soffit), expanding perimeter and street-pole scenarios. Third, the TBL8810-0010's Card Bullet references 802.3af/at PoE compliance explicitly; the TBL8710-000 provides no PoE class information in its specs. Where the cameras are equivalent — 8MP resolution, 4.3mm lens, H.265, WDR Pro, IR night vision, ONVIF — the TBL8710-000 is not disadvantaged. Installers requiring verified environmental ratings (IP, IK, temperature) or audio/storage must consult the full manufacturer datasheets, as neither is present in the supplied specs.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Geovision TBL8710-000 | Geovision TBL8810-0010 |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 8 MP (3840×2160) | 8 MP |
| Type | 8MP IR Bullet Camera | 8MP IR Bullet Camera |
| Form Factor | Bullet | Bullet |
| Lens / Focal Length | 4.3mm (4.3× optical zoom) | 4.3mm (4.3× optical zoom) |
| Video Compression | H.265 | H.265 |
| WDR | WDR Pro | WDR Pro |
| Min Illumination | Super Low Lux | Super Low Lux |
| IR / Night Vision | IR | IR illumination; Automatic day/night switching |
| Edge Analytics | — | AI-based |
| ONVIF | Yes | Yes |
| VMS Compatibility | RTSP/ONVIF | ONVIF-compliant systems |
| Power / PoE | — | PoE 802.3af/at (per card bullet; verify datasheet) |
| Mount Types | Wall; Soffit | Wall; Eave; Pole |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the TBL8710-000 or the TBL8810-0010?
The TBL8810-0010 is the stronger choice when edge analytics, pole-mount flexibility, or explicit PoE standard confirmation matter to the deployment. The single most concrete spec delta is AI-based analytics: it is present on the TBL8810-0010 and absent entirely from the TBL8710-000's provided specifications. Second, the TBL8810-0010 supports three mount types (Wall, Eave, Pole) versus two on the TBL8710-000 (Wall, Soffit), expanding perimeter and street-pole scenarios. Third, the TBL8810-0010's Card Bullet references 802.3af/at PoE compliance explicitly; the TBL8710-000 provides no PoE class information in its specs. Where the cameras are equivalent — 8MP resolution, 4.3mm lens, H.265, WDR Pro, IR night vision, ONVIF — the TBL8710-000 is not disadvantaged. Installers requiring verified environmental ratings (IP, IK, temperature) or audio/storage must consult the full manufacturer datasheets, as neither is present in the supplied specs.
Is the TBL8710-000 or TBL8810-0010 better for low-light performance?
Both cameras use IR illumination at super-low-lux minimum illumination and list WDR Pro. The TBL8810-0010 explicitly specifies automatic day/night switching in its IR spec field; the TBL8710-000 does not mention this in the provided data. Neither unit's IR range in metres is specified, so a definitive low-light advantage cannot be confirmed from these specs alone — consult the full datasheets for IR distance ratings.
Does either camera support AI or edge analytics without a separate server?
Yes, but only the TBL8810-0010. It carries an 'AI-based' analytics designation in its specifications. No analytics capability is listed for the TBL8710-000 in the provided specs. If reducing VMS server load or enabling direct edge-based alerts is a project requirement, the TBL8810-0010 is the only candidate of the two.
Can I pole-mount either of these cameras?
Only the TBL8810-0010 lists Pole as a supported mount type (alongside Wall and Eave). The TBL8710-000 supports Wall and Soffit mounting only, per the provided specifications. For perimeter posts or parking-lot poles, the TBL8810-0010 is the appropriate choice.
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.