ACTi A415 vs Geovision BL320-D02U: Specification Comparison
Both the ACTi A415 and Geovision BL320-D02U are 3MP outdoor fixed bullet IP cameras targeting perimeter and general surveillance deployments. This comparison examines how their imaging capabilities, environmental ratings, installation requirements, and integration feature sets differ—helping installers and IT buyers decide which unit is the better fit for a given project scope, NVR platform, or operational budget.
In This Guide
How do the imaging specs compare?
The ACTi A415 is built around a 1/2.7-inch sensor with a motorized varifocal lens spanning 2.8–12 mm (4.3× optical zoom), yielding a field of view that adjusts from 90.6° down to 32.7° without digital degradation. It delivers up to 30 fps at 2048×1536, a minimum illumination of 0.05 lux (color) and 0.005 lux (B/W) at F1.4, and onboard Extreme WDR rated at 142 dB. The 850 nm adaptive IR array is specified to 30 m working distance with a mechanical IR-cut filter for day/night transitions. Geovision's BL320-D02U is specified only as a 3MP camera; sensor size, lens focal length, field of view, minimum illumination, WDR capability, IR range, and frame-rate figures are not published in the available specification data.
For any deployment where low-light performance, backlit scene handling, or adjustable field of view are decision criteria, the A415 carries documented numbers that the BL320-D02U cannot be evaluated against. Buyers who need verified WDR depth, a specific IR working distance, or optical zoom should treat the Geovision's imaging stack as unconfirmed until the manufacturer's full datasheet is obtained.
What about installation and environment?
Both cameras carry an IP66 weatherproofing rating. The ACTi A415 additionally holds an IK10 impact rating (metal casing) and is certified to operate from −30°C to +50°C (−22°F to 122°F), making it suitable for cold-climate outdoor installations without supplemental heating. It weighs 834 g. The BL320-D02U's IK rating, operating temperature range, and weight are not stated in the available specifications.
On power, the A415 accepts either DC 12 V (adapter not included) or PoE Class 3 per IEEE 802.3af—note that while the field label reads 'PoE++ (802.3bt) Class 3,' Class 3 is an 802.3af class, so installers should verify actual power draw before selecting a switch port. The BL320-D02U is listed only as 'PoE' with no class or wattage specified. Mount options on the A415 include pole and wall; the BL320-D02U is listed for wall mounting only.
Which fits your VMS and analytics better?
The ACTi A415 supports ONVIF Profiles S, G, T, and Q, broadening compatibility with recording platforms that rely on Profile T (H.265 streaming) or Profile G (on-board storage access). Its compression suite includes H.265 Adaptive Stream, H.264 (Baseline/Main/High), and MJPEG. Edge analytics include VMD (Video Motion Detection) and People Counting. Audio is two-way with a dedicated mic-in, line-in, and line-out. PTZ control protocols Pelco-D and Pelco-P are also listed. The Geovision BL320-D02U declares ONVIF compliance and two-way audio, with H.264 compression specified; H.265 support, specific ONVIF profiles, edge analytics, and on-board storage capability are not documented in the available specifications.
Which should you choose: the A415 or the BL320-D02U?
Our take: The A415 is the stronger choice when verifiable imaging performance, cold-climate operation, and edge analytics are required. Three concrete spec deltas illustrate the gap: the A415 publishes a 142 dB Extreme WDR rating and a 0.005 lux B/W minimum illumination, while the BL320-D02U provides neither figure; the A415 carries an IK10 impact rating and a documented −30°C lower operating limit versus no published IK or temperature data for the Geovision; and the A415 supports H.265 Adaptive Stream and ONVIF Profiles S/G/T/Q plus onboard People Counting, whereas the BL320-D02U is confirmed only for H.264 and generic ONVIF. The BL320-D02U cannot be ruled out for budget-constrained, mild-climate installations where H.264-only VMS platforms are already in place, but the absence of published imaging, temperature, and analytics specifications makes direct comparison incomplete and shifts risk to the buyer.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | ACTi A415 | Geovision BL320-D02U |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 3 MP | 3 MP |
| Image Sensor | 1/2.7 inch | — |
| Lens / Focal Length | 2.8–12 mm motorized, 4.3× optical zoom | — |
| Min Illumination | Color: 0.05 lux @ F1.4; B/W: 0.005 lux @ F1.4 | — |
| IR Range | 30 m (850 nm adaptive IR) | — |
| WDR | Extreme WDR, 142 dB | — |
| Max Frame Rate | 30 fps @ 2048×1536; 30 fps @ 1920×1080 | — |
| Video Compression | H.265 Adaptive Stream; H.264 (B/M/H); MJPEG | H.264 |
| IP Rating | IP66 | IP66 |
| IK / Impact Rating | IK10 (metal casing) | — |
| Operating Temperature | −30°C to +50°C (−22°F to 122°F) | — |
| Power Input / PoE Class | DC 12 V; PoE Class 3 (IEEE 802.3af) | PoE (class not specified) |
| ONVIF Profiles | Profile S, G, T, Q | ONVIF (profiles not specified) |
| Edge Analytics | VMD; People Counting | — |
| Audio | 2-way (Mic-in, Line-in, Line-out) | 2-way |
| Weight | 834 g (1.84 lb) | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the A415 or the BL320-D02U?
The A415 is the stronger choice when verifiable imaging performance, cold-climate operation, and edge analytics are required. Three concrete spec deltas illustrate the gap: the A415 publishes a 142 dB Extreme WDR rating and a 0.005 lux B/W minimum illumination, while the BL320-D02U provides neither figure; the A415 carries an IK10 impact rating and a documented −30°C lower operating limit versus no published IK or temperature data for the Geovision; and the A415 supports H.265 Adaptive Stream and ONVIF Profiles S/G/T/Q plus onboard People Counting, whereas the BL320-D02U is confirmed only for H.264 and generic ONVIF. The BL320-D02U cannot be ruled out for budget-constrained, mild-climate installations where H.264-only VMS platforms are already in place, but the absence of published imaging, temperature, and analytics specifications makes direct comparison incomplete and shifts risk to the buyer.
Is the A415 or BL320-D02U better for low-light and backlit scenes?
Based on available specifications, only the ACTi A415 provides documented low-light and WDR figures: 0.005 lux minimum illumination in B/W mode, 850 nm IR to 30 m, and 142 dB Extreme WDR. The Geovision BL320-D02U does not publish minimum illumination, IR range, or WDR rating in its available spec data, so a direct comparison cannot be made.
Can either camera work in sub-zero temperatures without a heater enclosure?
The ACTi A415 is rated for operation down to −30°C (−22°F) per its published specifications. The Geovision BL320-D02U does not list an operating temperature range in the available specification data, so its suitability for cold-climate deployments cannot be confirmed without consulting the full manufacturer datasheet.
Which camera is easier to integrate with a modern NVR or VMS platform?
The ACTi A415 declares ONVIF Profiles S, G, T, and Q alongside H.265, giving it broader compatibility with current-generation NVR platforms that require Profile T for H.265 stream negotiation. The Geovision BL320-D02U lists generic ONVIF compliance and H.264; specific profiles are not stated, which may require manual verification against your VMS compatibility matrix before deployment.
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.