ACTi A32 vs ACTi A415: Specification Comparison
Both the ACTi A32 and ACTi A415 are 3MP fixed bullet cameras from the same manufacturer, making them a legitimate cross-shop for installers evaluating indoor-to-outdoor or budget-to-feature-set trade-offs. The A32 is a compact mini bullet positioned for mixed-lighting interior or sheltered perimeter use, while the A415 is a ruggedized outdoor zoom bullet with motorized optics and advanced analytics. This comparison covers imaging capability, installation and environmental resilience, and VMS/analytics integration to help buyers match the right model to their deployment conditions.
In This Guide
How do the imaging specs compare?
Both cameras deliver 3MP resolution, but their imaging subsystems diverge sharply. The A415 carries a 1/2.7-inch sensor, a motorized 2.8–12mm lens providing 4.3x optical zoom with an f/2.8–f/12 aperture range, and a minimum illumination of 0.05 lux (color) / 0.005 lux (B/W) at F1.4 with AGC on. It also specifies 142dB Extreme WDR and 850nm IR with a 30m working distance, combined with a Day/Night mechanical IR cut filter for true color fidelity in daylight. Maximum frame rates are documented at 30fps across three resolutions (2048×1536, 1920×1080, 1280×960).
The A32 specifies Advanced WDR (no dB figure provided in the supplied specs), Day/Night capability, and Superior Low Light Sensitivity (no lux value provided). Lens focal length, sensor size, IR range, and maximum frame rate are not stated in the A32 specs. The A415 therefore offers more quantified and demonstrably higher imaging performance on every measurable dimension where a direct number is available; the A32's imaging claims cannot be numerically validated from the supplied specification data.
What about installation and environment?
The A415 is purpose-built for outdoor deployment: it carries IP66 (dust-tight, jet-water resistant) and IK10 (50-joule impact) ratings confirmed by CE Class A, FCC Class A, and EAC certifications, and it operates across -30°C to +50°C (-22°F to +122°F). Its metal housing supports pole or wall mounting. Power options include PoE Class 3 (IEEE 802.3af) or DC 12V (adapter not included); the supplied specs list both 802.3af and PoE++ (802.3bt) Class 3 references, so installers should verify the exact PoE budget with the current datasheet. Camera weight is 834g (1.84lb).
The A32 carries no IP or IK rating in the provided specs, which limits its documented suitability to protected or indoor environments. It is rated for 802.3af/at PoE and supports wall and ceiling mounting. Operating temperature range, dimensions, and weight are not stated in the supplied A32 specs. For any deployment exposed to weather, vandalism, or temperature extremes, the A32 cannot be specified with confidence based solely on the data provided.
Which fits your VMS and analytics better?
The A415 is ONVIF-compliant across Profile S, Profile G, Profile T, and Profile Q, providing broad VMS compatibility including event-driven recording (Profile G) and metadata streaming (Profile T). It includes onboard Video Motion Detection (VMD) and People Counting analytics, plus 2-way audio (mic-in, line-in, line-out). Video compression covers H.265 Adaptive Stream, H.264 (Baseline/Main/High profile), and MJPEG. The PTZ command set supports Pelco-D, Pelco-P, and ACTi URL commands for motorized zoom control from a VMS.
The A32 is ONVIF-compliant (profile levels not specified in the supplied data), which provides baseline VMS integration for ONVIF-compliant platforms. Edge analytics, audio, compression codecs, and on-board storage are not documented in the A32 specs provided. Buyers requiring People Counting, 2-way audio, H.265, or multi-profile ONVIF support will not find those capabilities confirmed in the A32 spec sheet as supplied.
Which should you choose: the A32 or the A415?
Our take: The A415 is the stronger choice when the deployment site is outdoors, subject to weather or vandalism, or requires verified imaging metrics and edge analytics. The A415 delivers quantified 142dB Extreme WDR versus the A32's unquantified Advanced WDR, a documented 0.005 lux B/W minimum illumination versus no lux figure for the A32, and IP66/IK10 environmental ratings versus no stated rating for the A32. Its 4.3x motorized zoom, onboard People Counting, 2-way audio, H.265 compression, and four ONVIF profiles further extend its integration options. The A32 may suit cost-sensitive, sheltered, or indoor applications where those capabilities are not required—but because its operating temperature range, sensor size, frame rate, and low-light threshold are absent from the supplied specs, it cannot be fully specified from the data provided. Confirm both models' current datasheets before finalizing any design.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | ACTi A32 | ACTi A415 |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 3 MP | 3 MP |
| Sensor Size | — | 1/2.7 inch |
| Lens / Focal Length | — | 2.8–12 mm motorized (4.3x optical zoom), f/2.8–f/12 |
| Min Illumination | — | Color: 0.05 lux @ F1.4; B/W: 0.005 lux @ F1.4 (AGC on) |
| IR Range | — | 30 m (850nm) |
| WDR | Advanced WDR (no dB specified) | Extreme WDR (142 dB) |
| Max Frame Rate | — | 30 fps @ 2048×1536; 30 fps @ 1920×1080; 30 fps @ 1280×960 |
| Video Compression | — | H.265 Adaptive Stream; H.264 (Baseline/Main/High); MJPEG |
| IP Rating | — | IP66 |
| IK / Impact Rating | — | IK10 |
| Operating Temperature | — | -30°C to +50°C (-22°F to +122°F) |
| Power Input / PoE Class | PoE (802.3af/at) | PoE Class 3 (802.3af); DC 12V |
| Audio | — | 2-way (Mic-in, Line-in, Line-out) |
| Edge Analytics | — | VMD; People Counting |
| ONVIF Profiles | ONVIF (profiles not specified) | Profile S, Profile G, Profile T, Profile Q |
| Weight | — | 834g (1.84 lb) |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the A32 or the A415?
The A415 is the stronger choice when the deployment site is outdoors, subject to weather or vandalism, or requires verified imaging metrics and edge analytics. The A415 delivers quantified 142dB Extreme WDR versus the A32's unquantified Advanced WDR, a documented 0.005 lux B/W minimum illumination versus no lux figure for the A32, and IP66/IK10 environmental ratings versus no stated rating for the A32. Its 4.3x motorized zoom, onboard People Counting, 2-way audio, H.265 compression, and four ONVIF profiles further extend its integration options. The A32 may suit cost-sensitive, sheltered, or indoor applications where those capabilities are not required—but because its operating temperature range, sensor size, frame rate, and low-light threshold are absent from the supplied specs, it cannot be fully specified from the data provided. Confirm both models' current datasheets before finalizing any design.
Is the A32 or A415 better for low-light performance?
Based on the supplied specs, the A415 is better documented for low-light use: it states a minimum illumination of 0.05 lux (color) and 0.005 lux (B/W) at F1.4 with AGC on, plus 850nm IR at a 30m working distance with a mechanical IR cut filter. The A32 claims Day/Night capability and Superior Low Light Sensitivity, but no lux value, IR range, or IR wavelength is provided in the supplied specs, so a direct numerical comparison cannot be made.
Can the A32 be used outdoors?
The supplied A32 specifications do not include an IP or IK rating, and no operating temperature range is stated. Without those certifications documented, the A32 cannot be confidently specified for outdoor or harsh-environment installations based solely on the data provided. The A415 carries confirmed IP66 and IK10 ratings and an operating range of -30°C to +50°C, making it the appropriate choice for outdoor deployment.
Does either camera support edge analytics like people counting?
Yes—the A415 includes onboard VMD (Video Motion Detection) and People Counting as stated in its specifications. The A32 specifications as supplied do not list any edge analytics capabilities, so people counting or VMD cannot be confirmed for that model from the provided data.
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.