System Audit & Coverage Review
Many surveillance systems look complete until an incident happens. The most common failure modes are predictable: blind spots, unusable identification at entrances, poor exposure under mixed lighting, retention that collapses below policy targets, and user access that is either over-permissioned or unusable. This service reviews your current system and produces a prioritized remediation plan that improves outcomes without forcing unnecessary rip-and-replace.
What We Evaluate
Coverage gaps and blind spots
We identify where your system is missing critical visibility and where camera angles or lens selection reduce evidence quality.
Identification performance at priority zones
Entrances, exits, and controlled access points require stable exposure and usable detail. We focus on real investigation outcomes.
Lighting, WDR, and low-light behavior
Backlighting, glare, and mixed lighting conditions often erase detail. We assess where configuration or camera class changes are required.
Retention reality vs policy
We validate retention against your stated target. If retention is short, we identify the driver and the most efficient correction path.
User roles, permissions, and export workflow
We check whether the right people can review and export evidence reliably, without over-privileging access.
Network and PoE stability indicators
If cameras drop, freeze, or degrade, we look at PoE headroom, switching, uplinks, and segmentation issues that commonly cause instability.
Inputs We Use
We can perform an audit with minimal inputs, but the items below accelerate the review and improve accuracy. If you do not have a floor plan, a marked-up sketch is sufficient.
System details
- Camera count and general camera types
- NVR or VMS platform and recorder model
- Retention target or policy window
- Any recurring system issues you are seeing
Site context
- Facility type and operating hours
- Priority zones and incident scenarios
- Floor plan or marked-up sketch (ideal)
- Lighting constraints or known trouble areas
What You Receive
Prioritized findings summary
A clear list of the most impactful issues first, focusing on what breaks evidence quality and operational reliability.
Remediation plan with cost-control logic
Guidance on what can be fixed via configuration, what requires repositioning, and what requires camera class changes, prioritized to avoid unnecessary replacement.
Retention and storage corrections
If retention is short, we identify the drivers and provide a correction path, including settings tradeoffs where applicable.
Bill of materials for any required upgrades
If hardware changes are required, we provide a purchase-ready list aligned to the remediation plan.
When This Service Is the Right Choice
You have cameras but incidents are not usable
If you cannot identify, verify, or prove what happened, we focus on evidence-quality corrections first.
You are preparing for audit, insurance, or expansion
A structured review ensures the system is aligned to policy and stable before scrutiny or growth.
Want a prioritized plan to fix the system?
Share your camera count, recorder platform, retention goal, and the main failure you are seeing. We will map the fastest correction path.
System Audit & Coverage Review
Most surveillance systems look fine until an incident happens. The audit is designed to find the real failure modes: entrances that do not identify, blind spots that hide movement, retention that quietly falls short, lighting conditions that destroy usable detail, and access workflows that slow investigations. This service produces a prioritized remediation plan so you can fix what matters without guessing.
What This Audit Covers
We audit the system the way investigations and operations experience it: evidence quality in high-value zones, continuity of coverage, retention reality, and the workflow to find and export video fast.
Coverage geometry and blind spots
Validate camera placement against line of travel, choke points, and risk zones. Identify gaps where movement is not captured or is captured without usable detail.
Entrance identification performance
Review lens choice, mounting height, WDR behavior, and exposure stability at entrances and controlled doors where identification matters most.
Lighting and image quality failures
Identify backlight issues, low-light noise, glare, and scene conditions that cause motion blur or washed-out faces. Suggest practical remediation.
Retention and recording stability
Confirm actual retention, storage headroom, and whether recording settings drift over time. Identify gaps caused by capacity or configuration.
Network and PoE health signals
Look for intermittent drops, PoE overload symptoms, uplink saturation, and segmentation issues that affect uptime and remote access.
User roles and evidence workflow
Validate permissions, remote access posture, and export workflow. Investigations slow down when access is messy or exports are inconsistent.
What You Get After the Review
A prioritized remediation plan
Fix the highest-impact failures first: entrances, controlled access points, and any zones that regularly trigger incidents or claims.
Evidence-first recommendations
Recommendations are based on outcomes, not device marketing. Placement, lens intent, and settings usually matter more than megapixels.
Retention validation and sizing guidance
Confirm actual retention and provide a sizing path to meet your retention objective with defined tradeoffs.
A clear next-step service path
If remediation requires deeper planning, we point you to the right follow-on service: design, storage sizing, network planning, or access setup.
Typical Audit Findings
- Entrances covered with wide lenses that cannot identify faces in motion
- Backlight and vestibule lighting destroying usable detail
- Retention falling short due to storage under-sizing or settings drift
- Blind spots in corridors, docks, or parking zones where movement is missed
- Intermittent camera drops linked to PoE budgets or uplink saturation
- Permission sprawl and inconsistent export workflows
How the Audit Typically Runs
1) Define outcomes and pain points
Identify incident types, high-risk zones, and what "usable evidence" means for your team (identification, reconstruction, or compliance).
2) Review coverage and settings
Evaluate placement, lens intent, WDR, exposure stability, and recording configuration with focus on high-value zones.
3) Validate retention and stability signals
Confirm actual retention behavior, storage headroom, and any system errors that point to instability or configuration drift.
4) Deliver prioritized remediation
Provide a fix-first plan focused on the highest value outcomes, with recommendations that are actionable and cost-aware.
System Audit & Coverage Review FAQ
What is the most common issue you find?
Entrance identification failures. Cameras are often placed too high with lenses that are too wide, and backlighting causes faces in motion to wash out.
Can you audit without a floor plan?
Yes. A floor plan helps, but we can audit based on system configuration, camera list, and the zones you care about most.
Will you recommend replacing cameras?
Only when it is the most direct path to evidence quality. Many issues are solved with placement, lens intent, and settings changes before hardware replacement.
Can this help with retention problems?
Yes. We validate actual retention behavior and identify whether the issue is storage capacity, configuration, or recording mode mismatch.
What do you need from us to start?
Platform details, approximate camera count, your target zones, and what is not working today. If you have incident examples, they help prioritize quickly.
Do you provide a fix list we can hand to an installer?
Yes. The output is structured to be actionable: what to fix, why it matters, and what outcome it improves.
Find the failures before the next incident does.
Share camera count, platform (if known), and the zones that matter most. We will identify coverage gaps, retention shortfalls, and the highest-impact fixes.
There are no products listed under this category.