Surveillance Design Methodology
Surveillance systems fail when they are assembled from product lists instead of engineered from outcomes. This methodology defines how coverage, identification performance, retention behavior, analytics, and operational workflow are structured to produce usable evidence and predictable system behavior. The focus is evidence quality, retention stability, and operational clarity, not device feature checklists.
Design Framework Overview
Every surveillance system is designed through a consistent sequence. Each step protects evidence quality, prevents retention surprises, and keeps operations supportable over time.
1. Define evidence intent
Clarify what must be proven: identification, reconstruction, compliance validation, loss prevention, or safety response. Coverage is built around this intent.
2. Classify zones
Map priority zones by risk and function: entrances, controlled doors, transaction areas, perimeter lanes, parking zones, and general visibility zones.
3. Model coverage geometry
Set mounting height targets, lens intent, angle of travel, and identification distance requirements before selecting camera class.
4. Model retention and recording
Define recording profiles and retention targets, then size storage using realistic motion, bitrate, and compression behavior.
Process Diagram
|
Step 1
Evidence intent
What must be proven and why.
|
→ |
Step 2
Zone mapping
Entrances, POS, perimeter, interior.
|
→ |
Step 3
Geometry + lens intent
Mounting height, angle, ID distance.
|
→ |
Step 4
Retention + workflow
Recording profiles, export, governance.
|
This sequence is repeated whenever a site expands, a platform migrates, retention policies change, or analytics are introduced. Skipping steps creates drift and support burden.
Use the Calculators Where They Actually Help
These tools are designed to validate assumptions early: camera count, storage sizing, PoE headroom, analytics viability, multi-site rollout structure, and audit risk. They are most useful when used in the same order as the methodology.
Coverage + camera count modeling
Start here when you need to validate camera count by zone and design for identification outcomes.
Retention + storage sizing
Use this to model retention targets against real recording profiles and capacity, before purchasing recorders.
Network + PoE planning
Validate switch PoE budget, headroom, and network planning assumptions before install day.
Analytics suitability validation
Confirm whether the scene supports ID-grade analytics before enabling detection rules and notifications.
Multi-site rollout modeling
Estimate rollout approach and policy structure for programs that need consistent outcomes across locations.
Audit risk and blind spot assessment
Quickly identify whether your system is likely to fail on entrances, retention, or coverage geometry.
Where This Method Is Applied
The same core approach is applied across vertical environments, with environment-specific constraints handled inside the zone mapping and geometry steps.
High complexity environments
Moderate complexity environments
Special case environments
Ready to design from outcomes, not devices?
Share facility type, priority zones, retention target, and any platform constraints. We will recommend a coverage model and sizing path before equipment is finalized.
There are no products listed under this category.